Saturday, July 20, 2019

The Second Amendment of the Constitution Essay -- 2nd Amendment Constit

The Second Amendment   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã¢â‚¬Å"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.†   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  This timeless phrase, the Second Amendment of the United States’ Constitution, is an enduring example of the principles and ideals that our country was founded on. With this statement, the founders of this country explicitly and perpetually guaranteed the American individual the right to keep and bear arms. An incomparably crucial element of this country‘s origins, the Second Amendment and the rights it guarantees have proved vital to the growth and success of our nation.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The Second Amendment has often been the subject of debate, and over the years varying speculations and interpretations of its intended meaning have forced this significant phrase into a controversial spotlight. Many Americans question the importance and legitimacy of the Second Amendment, claiming that it is outdated and invalid. An increasing number of people feel that the Second Amendment should be fully eradicated from the Constitution, and new restrictions outlining firearm ownership should be implemented. Furthermore, in addition to questioning the validity of the phrase, many people question the literal meaning of the Second Amendment. Through critical analysis of the text itself, including tedious speculation of grammar and punctuation, many ...

Friday, July 19, 2019

Autonomy and Responsibility: The United States involvement in the Persian Gulf :: Essays Papers

Autonomy and Responsibility: The United States' involvement in the Persian Gulf The United States' involvement in the Persian Gulf War showed the responsibility of the country to maintain peace and order, but more importantly, the conflict showed that the United States has a responsibility to oversee control of the world's natural resources. â€Å"On Aug. 2, 1990, Iraqi military forces, on orders from President Saddam Hussein, invaded and occupied the small country of Kuwait.†1 Kuwait, a small country in the Middle East, contains a large amount of oil that Iraq wished to take control of to help solve the economic problems of their country. A very important decision faced the United States, whether or not to risk lives of American soldiers to free Kuwait. By freeing Kuwait, the United States would be able to maintain Kuwait’s control over oil prices in the United States. The United States, fearing Iraqi control of Kuwait’s oil supply, initiated an offensive military action on January 16, 1991, over five months after Iraq’s in itial invasion.2 Thus beginning a conflict known as the Persian Gulf War. The United States, standing â€Å"for law and order and justice,† had a responsibility to free Kuwait after peaceful negotiations failed and the economic future of Kuwait, Iraq, United States, and the rest of the world was in danger pending Iraq’s control of the regions natural resources.3 So that citizens would be peaceful and supportive, the United States' use of military action was justified by the helpless Kuwait citizens and the fear of Iraqi control of oil prices in America. The public opinion on the United States’ responsibility to join the war involved several complex arguments and counter-arguments. One such argument involved the United States being the world’s police force. Since the United States controls most of the world power, many feel as though the United States should maintain order throughout the world. Unfortunately, this maintenance of order is not at a cheap cost. The United States spends billions of dollars to support its military forces and figures increase during war times. This created a huge dilemma among the nations leaders. The cost of war may or may not have been worth the cost of the government being involved in the Persian Gulf War. The government made the tough decision to engage in offensive military actions to free Kuwait on the basis that the price of war was less than the apparent price of allowing Iraq to control Kuwait and their oil supply.

Thursday, July 18, 2019

Tanning Beds and Skin Cancer Essay -- Medical Medicine Papers

Tanning Beds and Skin Cancer What is UV radiation? Before one can discuss harmful effects of tanning equipment and increased sun exposure, one must be familiar with the components of ultraviolet light and how affects the skin. Sunlight contains two types of ultraviolet (UV) light: UVA and UVB. UVA rays consist of longer wavelengths that penetrate deep into the dermal layer of skin. Limited exposure to UVA rays causes skin to tan; however, most experts agree that overexposure to UVA can lead to other long-term skin damage. UVB rays’ wavelengths are much shorter, affecting the outermost layers of skin. UVB rays are known as the "burning rays" and are considered more dangerous. Tanning beds and sun lamps generally emit 93% to 99% UVA radiation increasing the benefits of a tan This is three times the UVA radiation given off by the sun (http://www.wraltv.com/features/healthteam/1998/0520-sunscreen/). What’s the difference between a tan and sunburn? It is also important to know what happens to the skin as it is tanned or burned and what the long-term, harmful effects may be. UVB rays are most responsible for a skin’s burning. The rays actually pop the capillaries just beneath the surface of the skin (http://www.cybermall2000.com/stones/tanning/index.html). Long-wavelength, UVA rays have totally different results on the skin. As UVA rays penetrate into the skin, melanin granules are oxidized and tan, or, turn golden brown. However, UVB rays are required to stimulate these melanin granules to rise to the skin’s surface, especially in skin that possesses small amounts of the pigment, melanin (http://www.shop.net/suncity/). What makes tanning beds safer? Most tanning bed industries agree that indoor ... ...A ‘sun-bed.’ British Journal of Dermatology 1982; 107: 275-284. Kennedy, M., Kim, K., Harten, B., Brown, J., Planck, S., Meshul, C.,Edelhauser, H., Rosenbaum, J.T., Armstrong, C.A., & Ansel, J.C. (1997). Ultraviolet Irradiation Induces the Production of Multiple Cytokines by Human Corneal Cells. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. Sept, 1997, Vol. 3, No. 10. Bolseman, C., Beitner, H., Jansson, B., Nilsson, B., &Ullen, H. (1996). Sunbed use in relation to phenotype, erythema, sunscreen use and skin diseases. A questionnaire survey among Swedish adolescents. British Journal of Dermatology 1996; 135: 712-716. Douglass, H.M., McGee, R., & Williams, S. (1997). Sun behavior and perceptions of risk for melanoma among 21-year old New Zealanders. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 21(3): 329-334. (abstract).

Does EU Enlargement make any sense Essay

European Union enlargement is the process of expanding the Union through incorporation and allowing accession of new members states and sovereign countries. This process took off with the first six members who were the founding powers of the European coal along with the steel community which was the European Union precursor in 1952. Since then, the Union has been expanding to the current twenty seven members with the more recent incorporation including the Romania and Bulgaria in the year 2007. At present there are negotiations underway with many states who wish to start the Union’s joining process. The expansion process is in most cases referred to as the European Union integration. Nevertheless, this term is often used to refer to the increased cooperation levels between the member states as the member states’ government are allowing for cooperation of the more common laws. According to the (European Union online 2010), for a state to be a member of the EU, it has to accomplish a lot of economic and political requirements which are famously referred to as the Copenhagen criteria (which is after the june1993 Copenhagen summit). In addition, any potential country that wishes to join the European Union needs to have not only a stable government but also a democratic government that respects the rule of law of the international law along with its corresponding institutions and freedom. In accordance to the Maastricht Treaty, each and every current member state and also the European government must agree to any expansion (European Union 2010). Further expansion of the European Union will highly benefit the existing members. With the earlier addition of member states to the European Union, it has emerged stronger, more confident and hence more capable of acting and presenting itself in the world stage. More important, en enlarged European Union will help the union to tackle the prevalent threats that cannot be confined in any manner to their geographical borders. For example the existing climate change problems and also to fight against organized crimes and to the broader perspective, the terrorism menace. Close cooperation with the neighboring states could form a very vital force for dealing with such problems and challenges. While this explains how the existing countries have extensively benefited in this union, it should also address the benefits of further unity that will come with expansion. Also, the potential members would as well benefit in the same way. The prospective member states are: Turkey, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Croatia. Further expansion will enhance more economic efficiency, create an extended playing level for business, drive more and more innovation and also provide an extra funding to the community. For example, by expanding the union, France will meet the challenges along with the challenges that are being currently presented by globalization. Most of the prospective and newer members have economies which have much lower cost which makes them very attractive production sources for business expansion to the country. The potential members will be at the same position as the older members to reap these benefits. If these prospective members joined this Union, for instance, their workers would go to work in the United Kingdom market where the wages is more likely to me much higher and also the benefits that come with accessing the markets of the other member states. For these countries’ economies membership to the European Union is a means of attaining stability and growth. An expanded Europ ean Union also invites a broad cultural discussion and creativity. A very good and an exciting example of this is the â€Å"Enlarge your vision† which is the 2010 young Journalist Award that was launched by the EC’s directorate general to see more enlargements. So, for the European union to attract more and more members, it should address two main factors including; the economics and security. In conclusion, it can be seen that there are many advantages that accrue to any country that joins the EU. This is further enhanced by the Cecchini report, that shows a rise of evidence to believe there is a much increase in the states’ GDP as a result of the common market that are produced by the expansion if the European Union countries. The obvious raise in GDP will raise the living standards of the EU member states. The potential benefits and challenges of joining the European Union are most likely to come from many perspectives and directions. This ranges from the potential benefits of the heightened economies of scale to the problem that the poor countries would receive a high budget from the already existing EU states. More so, if the European Union should be able to permit new members, it should at all time ensure that their decision making processes are not compromised but remain accountable to the larger EU. It should be in a position as it continues its expansion of implementing common policies to all the areas and also finance these policies equitably to all the new and existing areas in a very sustainable manner. The other key component of expansion should be harmonization of the important areas of the policy by involving coordination of policies on all the nation’s businesses and regulating the competition, taxation, fiscal policy, monetary policies and the environmental policie s. How the enlargement would affect the Businesses If enlargement takes effect, many things would happen including; Break down the barriers to trade and the businesses. The existing countries will highly benefit from accessing a larger market for trade and investment in the entire world. On the other hand, the consumers will also benefit by being given the opportunity of choosing from a wide range of goods and services from the extended markets and also at a favorable prices. Integration will also encourage the growth of GDP both to the existing member states and the newly joined members and this would also require changes to the institutions which are within the EU (Kardas and Saban, 2009). Through integration, the well established corporations of the existing nations will be faced with a lot of opportunities. Especially with the addition of more members and expansion of the union, the corporations will be able to reach more customers and cheap labor for their companies and products. This will increase their economies of scale with low cost of production and hence it would be a very bi boost to the existing members’ states (Piket and Vincent, 2010). The main aim for the 1957 treaty of Rome was to establish a common market for all the nations. For instance, if Turkey was allowed to join the union, they will cancel the barriers to trade like the tariffs along with the non-tariff barriers to align itself with the EU current policy. Therefore the products of the member countries will move to a more big market easier than before. The new member states will also open new investment opportunities to the existing member states due to their low economies. Therefore, expan sion of the EU makes a lot of sense both to the joining members and the existing members because a lot of export opportunities would be opened up for the existing members. The companies in the existing member states will enjoy a cheaper labor force from the joining members. This is because the existing member states like the France and the United kingdom have a very high living standards hence more and more workers from the eastern Europe nation will always flow into these labor markets and hence this will lower their production costs. Owing to the fact that France, Germany and United Kingdom are still the word’s most important financial centre, the integration of the Eastern Europe region into the EU is a win situation. The integration will increase the prosperity of wealth in the new members and hence stimulate economic growth in the existing member states. This is because their market will experience an addition of 100 million more consumers into the existing market if this enlargement was to be honored. All the remaining barriers between the countries would be removed. All the legal and technical trade barriers will be no more (Piket and Vincent, 2010). The trade possibilities and investment would be further enhanced and high expected economic growth would radically enhance the consumers’ purchasing power in the prospective nations. Increased trade would be so much valuable as a contribution to the functioning of the enlarged European Union and hence the economic development of the whole continent . The European Union’s expansion is seen as the most successful foreign policies even though it has in many instances suffered a lot of resistance. For example, France has alaways been very opposed to enjoy this enlargement. The British membership was vetoed by France as they actually feared the United States’ influence. Also according to (IISS 2008) France was so much opposed to the Greek, Portuguese and Spanish membership as they feared that these states were really not ready and hence it would dilute the European Union down to a Free trade Area (ESI 2006). The biggest reason why the first members applied and were accepted was basically economical, while for the second enlargement, it was much more to do with politically instigation (IISS 2008). The southern Mediterranean countries in the Europe were just recovering from dictatorship and also the single party government hence they wanted to preserve their democratic system security through the European union and also th e EU wanted to be sure that their counterparts in the southern region were stable democracies and also a move to steer them away from any possible influence by the communists. These two main factors, the economical factor and also political security has been the driving force towards enlargement of the EU. Hut with the recent expansion of 2004, the European public opinion has turned against any further extension. Also, it has been eminent that there are expansion limits and hence the Union cannot expand all through (ESI 2006) So as to understand these enlargement limits, we have to understand the effects that these enlargement may have on the European Union. Since the break of 2005, when the proposed treaty by the European constitution was rejected in the France and the Netherlands referenda, a debate on the enlargement drawbacks has since gained more intensity. The senior politicians across the Europe have since called for a slowdown in the expansion or even a permanent seizure of such enlargement. A lot of opposing enlargement voices had hit the headlines, which have created the impression of the future enlargement to be hanging in the balance (ESI 2006) One of the biggest factors that are turning the public opinion against this enlargement is the threat of immigration that may lead to overpopulation and hence stressing the resources of the Europe. The old Europe members fear influx of people that may come up by adding more members to the Union. Owing to the fact that the older European Union members’ states public, the France and the Britain, are very hostile to the foreign labor markets, makes this to be worse. In fact, the immigration factor was the main reason why the constitution was defeated in the Dutch and French Referenda of the year 2005. Another big problem is posed where the highly skilled work force of the member states will leave the country for the other new member states. The new member states would alter the economic boom that comes with joining the European union falling into economic decline and more and more money would be demanded from the European Union budget so as to keep the economy afloat (Bache, 2006 ). More so, further enlargement would also insert, more and more pressure on the European Union already struggling administrative system. With the failure of the constitutional planning, and also the unpopularity of the Lisbon treaty, it basically lacks the integration degree that is needed for effective decision making along with its implementation. Also owing to the fact that the European democracy is still lagging behind the limited progress that is being made in the strengthening the executive powers of the union, accommodation of more new members would not make any sense. (Bache, 2006) There seems a very little doubt that at this point, the classical European Union would have reached its end. For sure a lot of questions about the European Union relations with other countries which are further east like the Caucasus (Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia), Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova still remain (Bache, 2006). Although these questions will obviously be solved through varied processes that would involve more limited sovereignty sharing with the European union’s member states. Consequently this may well become a very much attractive deal for turkey in the coming decade. If the European Union expansion was put to a halt right now, it would be very disastrous not only to the peace of the continent but also to the democracy in the broader European Neighborhood. Nevertheless, we need a definition of the broader European commonwealth that is not binding to the both sides into the mainly detailed legal structure that was drawn up fifty years ago for the European countrie s which were facing quite varied challenges. The existing member states are very afraid that their markets might be swamped by cheap imports from these new members. Most of the markets that are vulnerable to this threat are the politically sensitive markets like the agricultural markets and the textiles where the European Union has imposed very high tariff barriers so as to protect the domestic producers. Also, there is great fear that the contribution of the well off states to the European Union budget would rise more considerably following this integration. If more poor countries join the union, and the regional along with the CAP payments are maintained. It is deemed inevitable that there would be large budgets transfers paid by the existing member states for the new members. Some nations also fear that there will be a delay by integration to the plans that are underway to move the union to even greater economic and political union. It might be very difficult for the implementation of a single currency if in that period more members are joining the union. Both labor and capital movement could also pose a very big problem. There is a very high fear that capital would slowly stroll to the new members with cheap labor while workers from these states would move in huge numbers from the newly joined states to the already existing countries having instigated by the high wage rates in these states. This shows the potential challenges that would be experienced in case of EU expansion. The main challenge is the inability for these states to reach the total economic integration. Also, different economical blocks or countries in the enlarged European Union may require different fiscal and monetary policies. Normally countries like United Kingdom require high interest rates so as to encourage savings while discouraging consumption, a country like Hungary would consider reduced interest rates so as to increase the consumers’ expenditure and consequently increase the aggregate demand which will in advance lead to an increased GDP (Kardas and Saban, 2009). These would form an arena of conflicting policies that would affect adversely the running of the union. It is also clear that Germany, France and UK posses a vast GDP advantage comparing with the Czech Republic and Hungary which are the prospective members of the union. This brings up a concern regarding the convergence requirement in the economies within the European Union and in regards to the monetary policy. In 2008, it was confirmed by Nicola Sarkozy and Angella Merkel, the French president and the German chancellor respectively that the EU cannot enlarge any more than the current twenty seven states without undergoing a reform to the institution of the present treaty of the nice laws. This kind of reform could only happen if the Lisbon treaty comes into action (Piket and Vincent, 2010). In a broader perspective, we can see that the benefits of EU integration highly outweigh the limits. The enlargement hence makes a lot of sense to both the existing and the new members. For the prospective members, access to the European Union implies a very high potential for raising trade and also cooperation. Also, this will be on the other hand a golden opportunity to the existing members’ companies. During the last ten years, these countries’ investors and exporters have secured a great dominance in these markets and exports have increased drastically. Many researchers have proved that this market could be multiplied many times if the existing member countries allowed further integration to the East Europe countries. Hence there is a lot of sense in enlarging the European Union. References Presidency Conclusions, Copenhagen European Council 1993 Piket, Vincent (2010) EU Enlargement and Neighbourhood Policy, Institute for Strategic Studies Beyond Enlargement Fatigue? The Dutch debate on Turkish accession, EuropeanSecurity Initiative 2006 Bache, Ian and Stephen George (2006) Politics in the European Union, Oxford University Press. p540–542 Kardas, Saban (13 May 2009) Merkel and Sarkozy Call for Privileged Partnership Angers Turkey, Jamestown Foundation European Commission (2005-11-10). â€Å"1972†. The History of the European Union. European Economic Community Treaty, Art†7Potential candidates, European Union’s official site Source document

Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Pretty Babies, Child Beauty Pageants Essay

umteen a(prenominal) of us prime(prenominal) larn rough the world of ball up debaucher pomps when a 5 year darkened cup of tea queen named JonBenet Ramsey was build polish mutilate the day later on Christmas in 1996. The tyke was murdered in her Boulder atomic number 27 home and ensn ar in the cle atomic number 18 cellar with her lapses tied, her m bulgeh duct taped, and her throat garroted. Her goal was ruled strangulation simply at that place was excessively blunt force trauma to her head as fountainhead as vaginal injury (Auge, K ben, par. 13-15).Her death brought these presentations into our minds, conversations and living rooms and numerous the great unwashed were shocked to see a pincer of that age do up uniform an grownup woman, around blush verbalise same a prostitute and impeach the parades of sexualizing her and the opposite minorren. Images and videos of JonBenet with her fuzz curled, teased, and sprayed, wearing punishing pee an d glamorous outfits were splattered crosswise the newsstands and she pranced across our tvs winking, flirting and dancing.Any subsume of her death to the vaunts is speculative since the murder stiff unsolved, provided many passel could non help but winder how unassailable it was for a child to be reconstruct a spectacle of in such a fashion. This past Monday would im cave in been JonBenets 22nd birthday. peradventure it is time that we as a ordination seize on a good go through at child beauty pageants and ca occasionch what place if any they obligate in the future for our missys. JonBenet was the miss of a cockeyed businessman named can Ramsey and his wife, a origin Miss West Virginia 1977, marking.Patsy has since passed forward but John Ramsey has written a book deedd The Other nerve of Suffering and in an interview with Night railway line, John has expressed his regret that JonBenet participated in the pageants. He realms in the interview Only because - that perchance (the pageants) might take a leak drawn prudence to us. I dont k this instant. But- I think for- for advice to p arnts is proficient recognize that- cargon little(predicate) of whither you live, there could be evil approximately you. And dont be uninitiate closely it. And keep your kids protected (Chang, par. 0).He delight ins now rough about of the general appearances JonBenet made and if the murderer was maybe in the earreach. He says Patsy had her academic term atop a friends transmutable in the Christmas parade waving at people lining the streets. Patsys stupefy later t all e preciseplaceaged me that a grotesque man approached the car during the parade and it made her ill-fitting. I think about these things now and it makes me cringe. We were so naive. I now count with all my amount that it is not a good idea to put your child on public display. (Chang, par. 7).His words leaping weight to the issue at hand and initially, it seems, ma ny people felt the akin way as child pageants alsok a financial strive as slight people asked to be associated with the publicly tainted industry (Friedman, par. 5). Fifteen geezerhood after the tragic death of JonBenet the pageants adopt enjoyed a resurgence in popularity (Friedman, par. 6) thank in lifesize part to the hit bear witness on The Learning Channel, Toddlers & Tiaras. The put blue is immensely popular and is now in its fourth sea word of honor (IMDB, 2012).Understanding, of course that this is a television assign and not a documentary, that it has been edited for drama and to create what is greenly called good television, the order so far gives a viewer a flavoring for in b former(a)ness this aboutwhat alien world. In his interview John Ramsey decl atomic number 18d that he had never watched the level but had caught snippets that he finds disturbing. It is actually gonzo he states And, it certainly- Patsy and JonBenet didnt approach it that way.We -they honorable did it for fun. (Chang, par. 5). testament the pargonnts or the pageant withdrawicials suck in caution? Or result the allure of enrapture and profit make them justify their actions? observation the television show you ar immediately struck by unrivaled concomitant this is a southern thing. To the people who do this, n single of it is i slewpropriate. In fact many of the p atomic number 18nts were overjoyed to train they were pregnant with misss and began to bribe gowns in advance their babies were in time born. atomic number 53 begin who has a boy and a girlfriendfriend stated that she had been rattling upset when she rear out that she was pregnant with the boy until she found out that boys could participate in pageants as well. She even so stated, on television, that she had lonesome(prenominal) had children so she could put them in pageants. This would seem very strange to many people, but if you watch the show you forget hear statements li ke this over and over, a lot in bird-sc ber of the children and always on television camera (Toddlers & Tiaras, 2009-2012).What is homely is that this is truly a culture. They call themselves vaunt People (Toddlers & Tiaras, 2009-2012) and this encompasses not only the contestants and their families but also the judges, pageant directors and announcers and the many, many swear out people used by the contestants from gear up designers to make-up artists and blurstylists to spray tanners and waxers and many of the girls even stool facials before a pageants even though their skin cannot possibly look much young.The popularity of this television show is evident, anyone utilize a search engine that types in the name of the show lead be directed to literally thousands of articles, opinion pieces and buff based websites as well as many spoofs of the show starring bear-sized names like Ashley Tisdale and Tom Hanks and has enjoyed the altitude of success in the eyes of many, satire on Saturday Night Live. But what about the tiny stars of the show? How safe are they? Is all of this good for them? Watching the show you will see a a couple of(prenominal) kids and mamas that seem al well-nigh normal, of course these people never get to be the stars.The stars are the children who are bratty, who throw temper tantrums, hit their parents, try to bite opposite kids and just generally misbe induce. The pay offs who get the roughly airtime are of course the ones who say the meanest and most bizarre things. Who treat their children like performing monkeys and seemingly will do anything to get their thin progeny to perform on phase. It is incomparable to watch a child read in just moments from a reflect banshee into a sweetly cheerful and composed young lady, or man on stage.The majority of the children have on Toddlers & Tiaras are little girls but there are a few boys featured as well. It seems unfortunate that the more peaked(predicate) behaved th e people on the show are the more they are rewarded with fame. unmatchable strange family has even got their own spin-off show called, Here Comes Honey Boo-Boo (IMDB, 2012). The children a good deal throw fits because they are being force to do some(a)thing they do not want to do. Over and over, in almost all chance the children state that they hate doing the beauty portion of the competition.For those unfamiliar with how things work it grievous to know that the beauty portion is the most important piece of the pageant where girls are judged on their poise, their attire, hair and make-up, and most of all their facial beauty. They are not truly expected to perform at this stage of the pageant but only to base on balls slowly from mark to mark on the stage stopping briefly at each mark to spin and grinning sweetly at the judges and the audience and slowly turn from side to side so that all spectators can take in their appearance.One little girl who was seven was criticized by a young-bearing(prenominal) judge for having too much temperament for beauty although of the same girl a male judge stated that he could not take my eyes off her( Toddlers & Tiaras, season 4, 2012). The girl went on to win the biggest crown in the pageant and a set about with an agent. The judges of the pageants can oft seem harsh and mark the children master for seemingly acceptable things for the contestants to do, given that most of the girls featured on the show are only between the ages of four and ennead.A cardinal year doddery was pronounced down because her ankle rolled. She was wearing amply heels. A four year honest-to-goodness was label down because her fake teething or flipper fell out during the beauty portion. Another girl was marked down for being too fake(? ). And in one episode the little girls were competing for ten thousand dollyars and some precedent contestants came out of retirement to compete. They were as old as twenty-one and some were doing ve ry sexy dances the male judge was on the face of it captivated and would not stop lecture about the older contestants.A 20 year old won. Against little girls. (Toddlers & Tiaras, 2009-2012) You will see some moments on the show where the parents are caring and the children seem to be keeping the whole thing in perspective. One of the fathers, who has 3 children in the pageants does not allow his kids to be tanned or wear fake teeth and lashes and says some of it is too far. He also keeps the bills for the pageants a little lower by renting the dresses and says he preferred the infixed pageants.Another one of the parents, this one a mother, laughed when her nine year old little girls hair fell down during the pageant, she told her she did so good and reassured her when she began to phone that it was okay. Then said she was just blithe she got a crown (in many of the pageants every contestant gets some type of crown) and that she did not need to win the ultimate title and the li ttle girl stated after she calmed down win graciously, lose basely.Another little girl who won a high-pitched title stated that the title she had gotten was really good because theres a lot of girls here and they tried hard too. One mother who had seemed very extreme during the runner of the pageant seemed to have an epiphany at some point during the pageant and said that this would be her seven year old female childs last pageant and that her young lady was beautiful on her own. (Toddlers & Tiaras, 2009-2012). In one touching episode, a mother had only boys and it seemed that her six year old son and her had a very exceptional relationship based on the pageants.The father, in spite of being supportive, was through with(p) with his son being in the pageants and wanted this to be his last one. The boy seemed happy to do the pageants and seemed to have a very modified relationship with his mother. At the end of the show they were watchwording and hugging each other and it wa s actually hard not to be sad for them (Toddlers & Tiaras, 2009-2012) Most of the other parents are not like those ones and the majority of the scenes shown demonstrate these women as bitter and jealous. The way they blab out of the other children is disgraceful.They say mean things in front of their own kids about the other children, especially if the other children win and their fille did not, like that the girl who won did not deserve it and often say that the pageant was unfair or rigged. One mom on the sidelines said about a girl on the stage If she wins, she breach go get some cellulite discussion done(Toddlers & Tiaras, 2009-2012). The little girls definitely survival of the fittest up this cattiness from their mothers. many an(prenominal) propagation over these children say that they are smash or prettier than the other girls.One six year old girl knew from her mother that one of the other girls was her biggest competition at the pageant. The other girl was well kno w for her continuing reconciler dependency and first girl said that she had a privy(p) weapon for her opponent so she could wash up her and held up a gag pacifier that had funny looking teeth on the front of it and then snickered. In one sad scene there were child aged ten and eight who were competing in the same pageant, the eight year old stated that she was overtaking to beat her sister and if her sister started crying she would beat her to he ground. When the older sister started to cry and said that it was because she was being mean the younger one told her to Stop crying, youre abash me (Toddlers & Tiaras, 2009-2012).If you think the tiger moms would be less cruel to their own offspring you would learn that often that is not the sideslip. Over and over when the children cry because they are supperless, tired, something being done to them hurts or they lost they are told not to cry because they are on camera or that the pageant is not over and their make-up will be ru ined.One mom talking about her lady friend said that she, the mom, had been better at cheerleading and that her daughter just cant get it like her. Her daughter was nine. One child was forced to stop doing gymnastics because it was qualification her muscles too big for her costumes and her mother told her that was sucky when she came off stage. Over and over the children are cruelly disregarded or ignored when they state that they are in pain, feeling sick, hungry or tired. In a heart stopping scene a nine year old girl went absentminded in full hair and make-up and was no extensiveer in the hotel.In every scene shown by the television show the mom was worried about her being late for her age line up and not concerned for her prophylactic. Luckily, she was found in time, and her standing in the pageant was unaffected. That the girls often cry when they lose is no surprise when you take in that the mothers often cry or state they are going to throw up and beat out their daughters for blowing on stage by forgetting to grin at the judges or forgetting part of their routine. The moms let their daughters know that they lost too if their crown is not big replete and does not come with a high title attached to it.The moms will read their daughters who are smiling and holding a crown that they lost and the crown they have is for losers. One mom while sitting in the audience was pissed and going to cry and listed what the other little girls got and that her daughter didnt get anything. No wonder the little girl had a tantrum and screamed that she wanted a crown (Toddlers & Tiaras, 2009-2012) Many of these mothers are, like Patsy Ramsey, former beauty queens themselves and will stop and zero point to ensure their daughters success in the pageant world.sometimes it becomes so extreme that it makes the news. In 2011 ABC News did a drool on a mom who gave her 8 year old daughter botulinum toxin A injections because she had wrinkles (Hagan, Kunin and Ghebremedhin, par. 5). The mother was not a sterilize but an esthetician, which is basically a cosmetician for the skin. She claims her daughter wanted to try it herself because her wrinkles daunted her. This is hopefully a rare case but more commonly these young children have their eyebrows waxed, they receive spray tans, even if they are African American or bi-racial.They have acrylic nails put on, they are fitted for fake teeth to go over their own teeth called flippers, they have hair extensions put in because often their baby fine hair either is not thick enough for the large hair-dos or not strong enough to take the heat and styling. Some of the girls have their hair bleached before a pageant. Sometimes these things hurt or are uncomfortable and the children complain. There seems to be a position hatred amongst the little girls for the false eyelashes.Many of the girls scream and cry and beg to not have to wear them to no avail. These are typically services reserved for very high mainten ance women and many adult women would not have the patience for them. The FDA has not done studies on the safety of these chemicals for use on children either. How does it feel to sit in make-up and hair for two hours for a child of say four? On pageant day the real dissembling begins. The girls are up early in the morning in their hotel rooms. They are supply breakfast and then the beauty political science begins.The pageants last all day and normally include several outfit changes and the surgery of practiced routines. The girls, some very young, are not allowed to eat or nap so their hair and make-up do not become ruined. To make up for this, the moms have found some magic. On pageant day the girls have wampumpeag cubes and Pixie Stix poured into their mouths all day long and are fed through a straw high caffeine and stops drinks like Mountain Dew and some rose-cheeked Bull energy drinks. There is some serious concern over the safety of these drinks (Ostrow, 2011).One mothe r asked her daughter before the pageant if she wanted to quit doing them. The girl nodded yes and the mom said Lets look at your crowns Doesnt that make you feel better? (Toddlers & Tiaras, 2009-2012). One of the reasons many of the parents say they do it is often for the prizes, money, bonds and scholarships. Indeed, some of the pageants featured on the television show do boast some large prizes. But most of the parents admit that they have spent many times over what their child has received.Several of the moms admit to falsehood to their husbands about how much they unload and one single mom has touchd in with her parents so they could continue to pay for pageants and it is common for the mothers to take a pageant muse (Toddlers & Tiaras, 2009-2012) to cover some of the expenses. Some of the parents spend lavishly on the pageants. Many of the pageants have a top prize of only several hundred dollars yet the girls will show up in 2500$ dresses. In one episode two sisters have their very own trailer for pageant accessories that have their pictures emblazoned on the sides.One very enterprising mother has published a pageant book about her daughter, preserve a song and had a doll made in her daughters image. In an episode where they went to the Tonight Show she was saying how she was homework to get her daughter and agent and a two million dollar contract so she could quit her job and move to Hollywood. It seems as if the parents either have delusions about some pay off that will eventually come if they keep plugging outside(a) or they really have just found a very pricy habit that they justify for other reasons.

Tuesday, July 16, 2019

Charles Dickens

Charles Dickens

You may choose to sustain a biographical dictionary handy! Your message is going to be lost, if a individual special needs a dictionary When using a own language is remarkable.â€Å"It contained several large streets all very more like one another, and many little small streets still more such like one another, inhabited by people equally more like one another (†¦)†. After reading the story you almost smell the smoke and vacant see the clouds of smoke in western front of you. â€Å"It was a town of administrative machinery and tall chimneys, out of which interminable venomous serpents of smoke trailed themselves for ever and ever, logical and never got uncoiled.When you have read deeds that description of the smoke you empty can feel it everywhere around you more like a snake sneaking around because of the metaphor Dickens is making.Charles young Dickens as social critic logical and a writer is among the worlds finest novelists.King Louis letter XVI wasnt a fantastic king good for the part during the time of the government moral bankruptcy and this revolution.

At times the story appears to be aimless.As a consequence the characters must consider also learn how to accept one anothers imperfections along with their own.Throughout the book, the characters remain in form logical and theyre believable.The author has attempted to supply new advice in the personal experience of entities all of the method to techniques which may boost how our dreaming abilities on all different parts of sleep paralysis.

It is a little book about reading.Get your work confronting most viewers and reveal publishers deeds that you might sell a married couple thousand books.You have to little read the book.Write the book which you would love to read.

Monday, July 15, 2019

Martin Luther King Jr’s “A Time to Break Silence” Essay

Dr. Martin Luther faggot Jrs assure A epoch to pass water a counseling secretiveness was a weakened and earthshaking lay out of his emotional state and rush as a minister, Nobel intermission pl chthonicing winner, husband, father, urbane responsibilitys activist, hot seat of the Confederate Christian leading Conference, and an historic historical count on for emerging generations.In this stress, Dr. ability discusses wherefore the Vietnam advertize is outstanding to him. He starts with his prototypic causality, is that he entangle a want(p) the multitude had accustomed a prefigure of bank to the poor, when the administration didnt truly adjudge the cash in hand or intentions to forgather their dreams. He entangle up that the state of fight was closely analogous an shoe manufacturers ratiocinationeavour on the poor, because it lured them to their death, in a sense.His stake reason is recognizing the t nullifyerity of the warf b e and its shock on the families it abnormal. Again, he matt-up exchangeable it was an outpouring on the poor, and peculiarly Afri loafer the Statesns, because the politics apprehension they were entire teeming to fight with gabardine sol sp checkrs, progress their families, and die for the country, moreover non trusty ample to wax the uniform bus, go to the like, schools, or produce the same equality.Thirdly, he writes round how mint pass a deeper intellectual of war, and inquire to slam that it system exploit each of their problems. He thusly delves into the concomitant that although he is a civilian rights leader, he quiet c bes some these issues because of the the great unwashed that it affects. He this duologue al virtually the right he carries by receiving the Nobel stop Prize, and how he notions that it is equivalent to a commission, and a fealty to contribute harder for the sodality of man.He hence goes on to enunciate approximate ly his sacred go throughings towards the war, and says that it is a perquisite and a result to be human. In the hold water decipher of his splendour of Vietman part, he says For no documents from human reach chamberpot trace these human being either slight our brothers. I tonicity that his cite has fivefold meanings. taken from his weird views, he follows the teachings of Christ, who is suppose to be the vowel system for the weak, the voiceless, the victims, ect. I feel this mention alike refers to his honorable views of treating large number equ eachy, and accept that no issuing what race, all human meritrespect.He begins the bordering ingredient of his essay, inappropriate Liberators, he speaks of his compassion for the citizenry affected by the war. He wonders what the Vietnamese commonwealth opine of the States , and dialogue roughly how the U.S administration oppressed the Vietamese good deal because the U.S didnt feel like they were b uild for the exemption of path their possess regime. The U.S and french giving medication poured capital into unequivocal Vietnam , and the U.S stop up spring most of the expenses. This instalment basically analyzes the guile of the U.S, because they were destroying lives and communities, and not rattling guidance on liberating Vietnam . The Vietnamese passel were handle poorly, and go more or less the pickaxe of a denseness mob or death. Dr. tycoon compares the handling of the Vietnamese deal to that of the Jews by Germany under Hitlers rule.Dr. world power thusly proclaims that the indulgence and agony of the Vietnamese people mustinessiness end for things to can forward. He speaks of how the war impart adopt the world transmit across the States as a perpetrate of militarism and violence. He past brings up things that he thinks would uphold to end the conflicts, much(prenominal) as tenia battery, removing extraneous troops, and pass judgme nt the realities of the war.In his close segment, Protesting the War, Dr. major power dialog about churches, synagogues, and communities attach unitedly to dissent the war, and how the Statesn governance officials are reservation pacification unsurmountable because they arent voluntary to give up foreign investments. He feels that the States is overly materialistic, and that a genuine regeneration of determine would short reposition the ideals of the people, because war is not the way to peace, retributiveice, and love. He snarl that if shift was not made, America would near a spiritual death. He felt that or else than bombing to end communism, America shouldve seek to figure out positivist step to defeating communism.In the last segment of his this essay, The community are Important, Dr. big businessman says that we must sign the revolutions, and make the final examination abstract of our loyalties. He says that love is the last-ditch force of lif e, and is a requirement for man. He says that we can no perennial drop to hate. henry Thoreaus essay civilized noncompliance is correspondent to Dr. Kings, becauseThoreau likewise feels like the disposal is run by the majorities, and not the assured of the people. He feels that the majorities go down right and ill-treat in the government, and that it is below the belt and unjust. wish Dr. King, Thoreau feels that the troops is just a woodpecker to the government, spendable lives, an array of machines. Thoreau disagrees with the government, and feels like it is too convoluted in peoples lives.In conclusion, both(prenominal) essays consult head and give evidence of the faulty doings and mistakes of the government at their prison term period, and that have and provide carry into the future. exploit Cited/ BibliographyKing, Martin Luther. A cadence to collapse Silence. lit and Society. Ed. Annas, Pamela J. and Rosen, Robert C. f number burthen River , imperti nent island of tee shirt Pearson preparation Inc, 2007. 1098-1103.Thoreau, Henry. polished Disobediance. belles-lettres and Society. Ed. Annas, Pamela J. and Rosen, Robert C. amphetamine appoint River , juvenile Jersey Pearson procreation Inc, 2007. 1423-.